Alpha/What we do/Ratings & Benchmarks

Alpha Ratings & Benchmarks

Independent AI governance ratings.

Alpha turns complex governance evidence into an independent, comparable opinion. Boards use it for oversight, investors for allocation and stewardship, insurers for underwriting, and public institutions for market supervision. The Alpha Governance Standard defines the method, AGR expresses governance quality, and GMI expresses governance materiality.

Public standardAGS
Governance qualityAGR
Governance materialityGMI
Transparent non-coverageNR

The Alpha system

Standard, rating, materiality.

AGS

Alpha Governance Standard

The public standard comprising the Alpha 12: the twelve dimensions Alpha evaluates across accountability, controls, disclosure, resilience, stakeholder impact, and corrigibility.

AGR

Alpha Governance Rating

The independent rating opinion that expresses how effectively an organization governs AI. AGR is a governance-quality view, not a model-safety certification or investment recommendation.

GMI

Governance Materiality Index

The companion materiality measure that indicates how much AI governance matters for a company based on dependency, strategic centrality, risk exposure, and stakeholder impact.

One public scale, from leader to disqualified.

Governance opinion - not credit, not investment advice
AAA
Leader
AA
Leader
A
Leader
BBB
Governance-ready
BB
Governance-ready
B
Developing
CCC
Developing
CC
Laggard
C
Laggard
D
Disqualified
NR
Not rated
Leaders - AAA to AGovernance-ready - BBB to BBDeveloping and lagging - B to CD and NR - disqualified or not rated

How to use

Quality and materiality belong together.

AGR answers how well the organization governs AI. GMI answers how much that governance matters for the organization. The highest-risk cases are high-materiality companies with weak governance quality.

Boards

Oversight posture, committee reporting, and governance-gap prioritization.

Investors

Peer comparison, stewardship focus, and diligence on material AI exposure.

Insurers

Underwriting context for governance controls, incident readiness, and accountability.

Public institutions

Comparable reference points for supervision, policy analysis, and market monitoring.

Sample profile

A rating should be inspectable.

Alpha profiles are designed to show the letter opinion, GMI materiality view, outlook, rationale, evidence basis, surveillance triggers, and the limits of the opinion in one board-ready view.

Methodology

AGR Methodology v2.4

Alpha ratings are produced under the Alpha Governance Standard. The public methodology explains the Alpha 12, evidence standards, rating governance, and limits of opinion; exact weights, thresholds, downgrade rules, and company-specific scoring logic remain controlled to preserve rating integrity.